Balotra is a city in Balotra district in the Indian state of Rajasthan. It was previously located in Barmer district, and it now lies within the newer Balotra district. The city lies at about 25.83 degrees north and 72.23 degrees east, at an average elevation of 106 metres. The 2011 census of India recorded a population of 74,496, made up of 38,715 men and 35,781 women, including 10,984 children aged six or under. The sex ratio of about 924 females per thousand males was close to the Rajasthan state average of 928, and the literacy rate was 64.39 percent. Balotra is connected by rail to Jodhpur, Jaipur and Chandigarh, and is served by both private and state road transport corporation bus services to other cities in India.
Facts
Elevation Band Climate Zone Sources
1. Balotra (Wikipedia)
Demographics, 2011 census
As of 2011 India census, Balotra city has population of 74496
Infobox: elevation_m
106
Part Of: India, Lead sentence
Balotra is a city situated in the Balotra district within the state of Rajasthan, India.
On Continent: Asia, Lead sentence
Balotra is a city situated in the Balotra district within the state of Rajasthan, India.
In Group: Cities of Southern Asia (World), Lead
is a city situated in the Balotra district within the state of Rajasthan, India
View the Source2. Koeppen-Geiger map (Kottek et al., University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna): World Map of the Koeppen-Geiger Climate Classification, present climate data
Koeppen-Geiger map (Kottek et al., University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)Koeppen-Geiger-ASCII.txt grid cell 25.75, 72.25Quote, Koeppen-Geiger-ASCII.txt grid cell 25.75, 72.25
25.75 72.25 BWh
View the Source 3. GeoNames: Balotra - GeoNames
GeoNamescities500 record 1277527, place matched by name within the country (only place of that name in the country)Quote, cities500 record 1277527, place matched by name within the country (only place of that name in the country)
25.83242 72.24 P PPL IN 24 115 579 74496 115 Asia/Kolkata
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.