Home›Protected Areas›Governing Body›Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (Brazil)Browse ByChico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (Brazil)FactsChico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (Brazil)ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsComparisonClassification AuthorityWell-attestedIUCN Protected Area Management Categories 1Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (Brazil)Filter Results4 entriesCountryAllBrazil (4)IUCN CategoryAllNational Parks of South America (4)National Designation TypeAllNational Park (4)International DesignationAllRamsar Site (Wetland of International Importance) (1)UNESCO World Heritage Site (4)Marine or TerrestrialAllMarine (1)Terrestrial (3)Governance TypeAllGovernance by Government (3)Shared Governance (1)Establishment EraAll1939 (1)1979 (1)1981 (1)1988 (1)Area BandAll54 to 208.56 sq km (1)647.37 to 1,863.75 sq km (3)ContinentAllSouth America (4)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 4Fernando de Noronha Marine National ParkChico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (Brazil)Iguacu National ParkChico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (Brazil)Pantanal Matogrossense National ParkChico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (Brazil)Serra da Capivara National ParkChico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (Brazil)ConnectionsShowing the first 400 of 828 connections.Sources1. IUCN protected area categories - Wikipediatier 2WikipediaTable of contents, seven categories heading listQuote, Table of contents, seven categories heading listCategory Ia - strict nature reserve; Category Ib - wilderness area; Category II - national park; Category III - natural monument or feature; Category IV - habitat or species management area; Category V - protected landscape or seascape; Category VI - protected area with sustainable use of natural resourcesView the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.