Geography Atlas

Where Everything Happened
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
City

Jalaquduq

Central Asia

Jalaquduq, written Джалакудук; 1976-2015 in Russian, is a city in Andijan Region of Uzbekistan, and the administrative center of Jalaquduq District. Its recorded population was 11,043 in 1989 and 24,000 in 2016, growth of about 117 percent over 27 years. It received town status in 1976. From 1976 to 2015 it was named Oxunboboev, also written Akhunbabayev, and before 1976 it was called Soʻfiqishloq, or Sufi-Kishlak in Russian. The Andijan Region is one of the regions into which Uzbekistan is divided. Uzbekistan is a doubly landlocked country in Central Asia, so Jalaquduq has no coast.

Facts
Population
24,000 1
Elevation (m)
682 2
Elevation Band
Highland 2
Coastal
No 3
Time Zone
UTC+05:00 4
Sources
1. Jalaquduq (Wikipedia)
Lead
Quote, Lead
Its population was 11,043 in 1989, and 24,000 in 2016.
View the Source
2. Opentopodata: SRTM 90 m elevation at the coordinates of Jalaquduq
Opentopodata
  • SRTM 90 m elevation at the coordinates the article infobox gives for the town
    "elevation": 682.0
  • Elevation band of the SRTM 90 m elevation of the town (sea level up to 10 m, lowland up to 500 m, highland up to 1500 m, mountain above)
    "elevation": 682.0
View the Source
3. Uzbekistan (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead, landlocked country
    Uzbekistan, officially the Republic of Uzbekistan, is a sovereign, doubly landlocked country located in Central Asia.
  • On Continent: Asia, Lead
    Uzbekistan, officially the Republic of Uzbekistan, is a sovereign, doubly landlocked country located in Central Asia.
View the Source
4. IANA Time Zone Database: IANA Time Zone Database, asia zone file
IANA Time Zone DatabaseHeading above the two Uzbekistan zones, Asia/Samarkand and Asia/Tashkent, both with standard offset 5:00
Quote, Heading above the two Uzbekistan zones, Asia/Samarkand and Asia/Tashkent, both with standard offset 5:00
# Uzbekistan
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.