Quakenbrück is a town in the district of Osnabrück, in Lower Saxony, Germany, situated on the river Hase. It is part of the Samtgemeinde, or collective municipality, of Artland.
Facts
Area (sq km) Founding Year Founding Year Population Estimate Year Elevation (m) Latitude52.677222 degrees north 1 Elevation Band Climate Zone Sources
1. Quakenbrück (Wikidata)
P1082 (population)
population 14,088 (2025)
P625 (coordinate location)
latitude 52.677222, longitude 7.9575
P2044 (elevation above sea level)
elevation 24 m
P2046 (area)
area 17.95 sq km
P1082 (population), P585 (point in time)
population 14088 (2025)
View the Source2. Quakenbrück (Wikipedia)
Source text, founding-year-range-start: 1234
Quakenbrück was founded in 1234 by the Bishop of Osnabrück, according to the earliest documents, although the area had been settled previously.
Source text, founding-year-range-end: 1234
Quakenbrück was founded in 1234 by the Bishop of Osnabrück, according to the earliest documents, although the area had been settled previously.
Source text, founding-year: 1234
Quakenbrück was founded in 1234 by the Bishop of Osnabrück, according to the earliest documents, although the area had been settled previously.
- In Group: Cities of Western Europe (World), Wikipedia; part-of country and UN M49 subregion
View the Source3. GeoNames: Quakenbrück - GeoNames
GeoNamesPlace record, elevationQuote, Place record, elevation
Elevation ca. 25 m
View the Source 4. Koeppen-Geiger map (Kottek et al., University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna): World Map of the Koeppen-Geiger Climate Classification, present climate data
Koeppen-Geiger map (Kottek et al., University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)Koeppen-Geiger-ASCII.txt grid cell 52.75, 7.75Quote, Koeppen-Geiger-ASCII.txt grid cell 52.75, 7.75
52.75 7.75 Cfb
View the Source 5. GeoNames: Quakenbrück - GeoNames
GeoNamescities500 record 2851523Quote, cities500 record 2851523
52.67397 7.94904 P PPLA4 DE 06 00 03459 03459030 12727 25 Europe/Berlin
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.