Caxias do Sul is a municipality in the state of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil. The 2022 census figures compiled by City Population count 463,501 inhabitants in the municipality, against 435,551 at the 2010 census and 360,419 at the 2000 census. GeoNames places Caxias do Sul at latitude -29.16806 and longitude -51.17944, about 787 metres above sea level by its digital elevation model, and assigns it to a time zone that is UTC-3 in the IANA time zone database. GeoNames lists it as a populated place. Caxias do Sul is not the capital of Rio Grande do Sul, which is Porto Alegre. The atlas places it in the South America subregion and treats it as a city for browsing purposes. GeoNames carries a population figure of 479,599 for it.
Facts
Elevation (m) Elevation Band Climate Zone Sources
1. City Population: Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul (population of the municipalities)
City PopulationMunicipalities table, census of 2022-08-01Quote, Municipalities table, census of 2022-08-01
Caxias do Sul Municipality 360,419 435,551 463,501
View the Source 2. GeoNames: Caxias do Sul
GeoNames page, Population
Population 479,599
GeoNames page, elevation, banded by atlas thresholds
SRTM3 787 m
GeoNames page, Timezone
Timezone America/Sao_Paulo
Coordinates
Coordinates -29.16806, -51.17944
Elevation
SRTM3 787 m
Part Of: Brazil, GeoNames hierarchy line
Home > South America > Brazil BR > Rio Grande do Sul 23
On Continent: South America, GeoNames hierarchy line
Home > South America > Brazil BR > Rio Grande do Sul 23
In Group: Cities of South America (World), GeoNames hierarchy line
Home > South America > Brazil BR > Rio Grande do Sul 23
View the Source3. Koeppen-Geiger map (Kottek et al., University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna): World Map of the Koeppen-Geiger Climate Classification, present climate data
Koeppen-Geiger map (Kottek et al., University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna)Koeppen-Geiger-ASCII.txt grid cellQuote, Koeppen-Geiger-ASCII.txt grid cell
-29.25 -51.25 Cfa
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.